Let’s
start off with the obvious. Recycling is
great! I think that everyone should be
doing it as often and for as many products as they can. However, it’s not always that cut and dry an
issue. I will likely write in the future
about specific types of recycling (ex: tech product recycling, plastics more
specifically), but I want to take this time to talk about recycling in
general. I hope this post isn’t a huge
bummer; I’m going to view it as a good dose of the realness. You see, the efficiency of recycling really
depends on what you are recycling
and where you live.
View from the front yard of my childhood home. I love this place with all my being. |
I'm going to start off with the
latter, that where you live impacts how efficient a choice recycling is for you
and your household. As you probably
know, not all recycling programs are created equal. I have experienced both ends of the recycling
support spectrum in my life. I grew up
on a farm in south central Kentucky, and, to this day, there is no
infrastructure for recycling where my parents live. Luckily, when I was growing up, my father’s
45 minute commute took him right past a recycling facility, and about once a
month we loaded all our glass and aluminum (I don’t think they took plastics)
into my Dad’s car. While this worked for
us, most of our neighbors had no means of getting their recyclables to the
distant facility, and now that my father has moved to a much closer job (10
minute commute, he is so happy!) my parents are without a means to
recycle. On the other end of things,
after moving to California, I’ve been lucky enough to live in two cities that
take their recycling very seriously: Long Beach and Davis. Despite this, when I
was researching this post I found that some things which I had been able to
recycle in Long Beach (ex: Styrofoam, soymilk cartons) are not accepted here in
Davis. Oops, looks like all that washing
out of my roommate’s fast food containers has been for not.
Through my own life, you can see
the two major ways that location impacts recycling. First, infrastructure impacts recycling
efficiency. Lavee (2007) performed an analysis
of a study from Israel showing that recycling of municipal solid wastes is most
economically beneficially in areas with dense populations due to low start-up
costs and the ease of consolidating the recyclable materials. So, recycling is most economically viable in
large, urban areas where waste doesn’t have to travel very far to get to the
processing facilities*. Second, depending on where you live,
something things just will not be recyclable.
Take my example above with the Styrofoam, and apply it to your area. This information is important, not just
because it informs your decision on what to buy, but because improper recycling
hurts us down the line. The more time
and person-power required to sort through our recycling, the less cost effective
the system becomes. Additionally, if you
(or people at your apartment building) mix trash in with the recyclables, your
items might end up just getting tossed due to health concerns for workers at
recycling facilities. Last, depending on
the recycling facility, some items commonly thrown into recycling bins can
really harm equipment. For example,
plastic sheeting (like what products come wrapped in) and thin plastic bags get
wrapped around equipment in fully mechanized sorting facilities, causing losses
of time and money (check this story
for an example).
Okay, so, maybe you are lucky
enough to have access to one of the 9,000 (and rising!) curbside recycling programs
in the USA (EPA, 2009). That’s
great! You should be recycling
stuff! Same rules as above apply, so go
and check out what is actually accepted by your recycling facility. You can feel really good because you are
helping to save tons of virgin materials and energy. The nifty graph from Morris (2005) shows how
much energy is required to make products from recycled versus virgin
materials. Looks pretty straight forward
yes? But let’s go through it together,
because there are few things a simple graph like this really fails to convey.
From Morris (2005) |
Let’s
start with aluminum. We get the biggest
bang for our recycling buck with this stuff.
I always try to buy canned products whenever possible for this
reason. This is one of the most
profitable and energy efficient products to recycle. With newsprint and cardboard, the returns are
less, but still apparent. This is
probably due to the ease of access of virgin materials used here (tress…) as
opposed to those used to make metals. Despite
this, making new paper from old paper is still 50% more energy savvy. Steel and glass recycling are actually pretty
energy intensive processes. It’s still
more energy efficient to recycle as opposed to landfill these items, but the benefits
are noticeably less. Last, let’s address
those weird abbreviations on the x-axis.
These are two different types of plastic pellets. As you can see, making plastic products from
recycled plastic materials is pretty darn good at saving energy. But here is the rub; plastic pellets are not
made from old plastic pellets. A plastic
milk carton can never be a milk carton again.
Your soda bottle will never hold another soda. With each step down the recycling chain,
plastic gets closer and closer to an end product that is (in many cases) not
itself recyclable. Check out this website from the state of Maine for
some examples of what recycled plastic products become. Still recycling is better than land filling
right? Energy is saved at some point in
all of these processes, but isn’t there
a better way?
This beautiful basil was delicious, and I did not miss the plastic container so many stores try to sell it in! |
I would
argue that there is a better way, a way saves energy by reducing the need for
recycling and reduces waste. We need to
focus our energies on the first two of the “three r’s.” First, we need to reduce the amount of packaging (of all kinds) we consume. Eeps!
But what about Oreos, Rachel?
They are the best, and also wrapped in plastic. Relax friends; remember, this is the Practical Ecologist. I am not asking anyone to move mountains, or
to make lifestyle changes they are not prepared for at this time. Everyone is at a different place in their journey
after all. It’s often the small changes
we make in our lives that actually stick, and the habits we stick with are the
ones that have a chance to make a difference. I’ll have tons of posts coming about how to
reduce your use, and hopefully each of us will be able to apply a few of them! I might even try to address this Oreo issue
(it’s a real life struggle for me).
My food/beverage containers |
Second, we need to reuse the stuff that we buy. Okay, no free lunch here. The only thing you risk by reusing things is
people thinking you are a little funny.
You get to be that gal/fella who uses old peanut butter jars as Tupperware. Wash off your tinfoil and use it again! Bring your reusable mugs and bags! Patch your clothes! I get giddy even thinking about it. Bring to mind even one of those cheesy info-grams
about how much plastic we would save is we all just brought our own bags to the
store, and multiply this by your own creativity! What can you reuse? And then, after you have reduced your waste down to things you really want/need to buy and reused the stuff as much as possible,
THEN you recycle it. And then all the dolphins smile and the
little hippie-babies at the farmer’s market all dance for you. Really.
FINAL WORD: Recycling is way, way important, and I’m so
glad to live in a world where the importance of accessible recycling is
becoming a focus. However, recycling is
not a cure all for our waste issues. It is
up to us to change our behavior. Vote with your dollars on products you need
that match your values, and thank the good Lord for Pintrest because reusing is
so in right now. Whee!
What do you think? Are you sold on my view of the “3 r’s.” Have you read any cool articles that might
apply to this issue? Got any creative
reduce/reuse tips? How will this fit in
with your lifestyle?
*The study found that recycling was economically beneficial
in about 25% of small and regional municipalities. We must take into consideration the general
differences in infrastructure between the US and Israel, but I believe the
general lesson still holds true.
-D. Lavee. 2007. Is Municipal Solid Waste Recycling Economically Efficient? Environmental Management 40: 926-943.
-J. Morris. 2005. Comparative LCAs for Curbside Recycling Verses Either Landfilling or Incineration with Energy Recovery. Int. Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 10 (4): 273-284.
-Environmental Protection Agency. 2009. EPA.gov.
This is awesome, Rachel--I really need to start being more friendly to the environment and you have some great ideas here!
ReplyDeleteThanks! We can all always do more, so you are not alone in that boat. The most important thing is to pick something (usually something small) that you think will actually become a habit. Starting from a place of success makes other changes down the line seem more possible. Good luck! Let me know if there is anything specific you would like to see me write about more.
Delete